Unterschiede
Hier werden die Unterschiede zwischen zwei Versionen angezeigt.
| Beide Seiten der vorigen Revision Vorhergehende Überarbeitung Nächste Überarbeitung | Vorhergehende Überarbeitung | ||
| electrical_engineering_and_electronics_1:block15 [2025/11/22 13:21] – mexleadmin | electrical_engineering_and_electronics_1:block15 [2025/11/23 11:47] (aktuell) – mexleadmin | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Zeile 1: | Zeile 1: | ||
| - | ====== Block 15 — Magnets | + | ====== Block 15 — Magnets, their Effects |
| ===== Learning objectives ===== | ===== Learning objectives ===== | ||
| Zeile 188: | Zeile 188: | ||
| - | ~~PAGEBREAK~~ ~~CLEARFIX~~ | + | In the following chapters the magnetic field will also be divided into a " |
| - | === Complex Geometry: toroidal Coil === | + | Since the $H$-field focuses on the causing current ($M \sim I$) and does not give us a force depending on the value of second magnet/ |
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Common pitfalls ===== | ||
| + | * ... | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Exercises ===== | ||
| + | {{page> | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | <panel type=" | ||
| + | |||
| + | The current $I_0 = 100~\rm A$ flows in a long straight conductor with a round cross-section. | ||
| + | The conductor shall have constant electric properties everywhere. | ||
| + | The radius of the conductor is $r_{\rm L}= 4~\rm mm$. | ||
| + | |||
| + | 1. What is the magnetic field strength $H_1$ at a point $P_1$, which is __outside__ the conductor at a distance of $r_1 = 10~\rm cm$ from the conductor axis? | ||
| + | |||
| + | # | ||
| + | |||
| + | * The $H$-field is given as: the current $I$ through an area divided by the " | ||
| + | * The relevant current is the given $I_0$. | ||
| + | |||
| + | # | ||
| + | |||
| + | # | ||
| + | |||
| + | The $H$-field is given as: | ||
| + | \begin{align*} | ||
| + | H(r) &= {{I_0}\over{2\pi \cdot r}} \\ | ||
| + | &= {{100~\rm A}\over{2\pi \cdot 0.1 ~\rm m}} \\ | ||
| + | \end{align*} | ||
| + | |||
| + | # | ||
| + | |||
| + | # | ||
| + | \begin{align*} | ||
| + | H(10~\rm cm) &= 159.15... ~\rm{{A}\over{m}} \\ | ||
| + | \rightarrow H(10~\rm cm) &= 159 ~\rm{{A}\over{m}} | ||
| + | \end{align*} | ||
| + | |||
| + | # | ||
| + | |||
| + | 2. What is the magnetic field strength $H_2$ at a point $P_2$, which is __inside__ the conductor at a distance of $r_2 = 3~\rm mm$ from the conductor axis? | ||
| + | |||
| + | # | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Again, the $H$-field is given as: the current $I$ through an area divided by the " | ||
| + | * Here, the relevant current is **not** the given one. There is only a fraction of the current flowing through the part of the conductor inside the $r_2$ | ||
| + | |||
| + | # | ||
| + | |||
| + | # | ||
| + | |||
| + | The $H$-field is given as: | ||
| + | \begin{align*} | ||
| + | H(r) &= {{I}\over{2\pi \cdot r}} | ||
| + | \end{align*} | ||
| + | |||
| + | But now $I$ is not $I_0$ anymore, but only a fraction, so $\Delta I$. | ||
| + | $I_0$ is evenly distributed over the cross-section $A$ of the conductor. | ||
| + | The cross-sectional area is given as $A= r^2 \cdot \pi$ | ||
| + | |||
| + | So the current $\Delta I$ is given as: current divided by the full area and then times the fractional area: | ||
| + | \begin{align*} | ||
| + | \Delta I &= I_0 \cdot {{r_2^2 \cdot \pi}\over{r_{\rm L}^2 \cdot \pi}} \\ | ||
| + | & | ||
| + | \end{align*} | ||
| + | |||
| + | Therefore, the $H$-field is: | ||
| + | \begin{align*} | ||
| + | H(r) &= {{\Delta I}\over{2\pi \cdot r_2}} | ||
| + | && | ||
| + | & | ||
| + | && | ||
| + | \end{align*} | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | # | ||
| + | |||
| + | # | ||
| + | \begin{align*} | ||
| + | H(3~\rm mm) &= 2984.1... ~\rm{{A}\over{m}} \\ | ||
| + | \rightarrow H(3~\rm mm) &= 3.0 ~\rm{{kA}\over{m}} | ||
| + | \end{align*} | ||
| + | |||
| + | # | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | <panel type=" | ||
| < | < | ||
| - | < | + | < |
| - | {{url>https://www.falstad.com/ | + | </ |
| + | {{drawio>Task1LadderArrangement.svg}} \\ | ||
| + | </WRAP> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Three long straight conductors are arranged in a vacuum to lie at the vertices of an equilateral triangle (see <imgref BildNr01> | ||
| + | |||
| + | 1. What is the magnetic field strength $H({\rm P})$ at the center of the equilateral triangle? | ||
| + | |||
| + | # | ||
| + | |||
| + | * The formula for a single wire can calculate the field of a single conductor. | ||
| + | * For the resulting field, the single wire fields have to be superimposed. | ||
| + | * Since it is symmetric the resulting field has to be neutral. | ||
| + | |||
| + | # | ||
| + | |||
| + | # | ||
| + | |||
| + | In general, the $H$-field of the single conductor is given as: | ||
| + | \begin{align*} | ||
| + | H & | ||
| + | | ||
| + | \end{align*} | ||
| + | |||
| + | * However, even without calculation, | ||
| + | * By the symmetry of the conductor, the angles of the $H$-field vectors are defined and evenly distributed on the revolution: | ||
| < | < | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | {{drawio> | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | # | ||
| - | A toroidal coil has a donut-like setup. This can be seen in <imgref BildNr04> | + | # |
| - | For reasons of symmetry, it shall get clear that the field lines form concentric circles. | + | \begin{align*} |
| - | The magnetic field in a toroidal coil is often considered as homogenious. | + | H &= 0 ~\rm{{A}\over{m}} |
| + | \end{align*} | ||
| + | # | ||
| - | The magnetic field will also be considered a " | + | 2. Now, the current in one of the conductors is reversed. To which value does the magnetic field strength $H({\rm P})$ change? |
| + | # | ||
| + | * Now, the formula for a single wire has to be used to calculate the field of a single conductor. | ||
| + | * For the resulting field, the single wire fields again have to be superimposed. | ||
| + | * The symmetry and the result of question 1 give a strong hint about how much stronger the resulting field has to be compared to the field of the reversed one. | ||
| + | # | ||
| - | ===== Common pitfalls ===== | + | # |
| - | * ... | + | |
| + | The $H$-field of the single reversed conductor $I_3$ is given as: | ||
| + | \begin{align*} | ||
| + | H(I_3) &= {{I}\over{2\pi \cdot r}} \\ | ||
| + | | ||
| + | \end{align*} | ||
| + | |||
| + | Once again, one can try to sketch the situation of the field vectors: | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | {{drawio> | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | Therefore, it is visible, that the resulting field is twice the value of $H(I_3)$: \\ | ||
| + | The vectors of $H(I_1)$ plus $H(I_2)$ had in the task 1 just the length of $H(I_3)$. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | # | ||
| + | |||
| + | # | ||
| + | \begin{align*} | ||
| + | H &= 31.830... ~\rm{{A}\over{m}} \\ | ||
| + | \rightarrow H &= 31.8 ~\rm{{A}\over{m}} \\ | ||
| + | \end{align*} | ||
| + | |||
| + | # | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{page> | ||
| - | ===== Exercises ===== | ||
| - | ==== Worked examples ==== | ||
| - | ... | ||
| ===== Embedded resources ===== | ===== Embedded resources ===== | ||
| Zeile 223: | Zeile 381: | ||
| Superposition of magnetic fields | Superposition of magnetic fields | ||
| {{youtube> | {{youtube> | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP column half> | ||
| + | {{youtube> | ||
| </ | </ | ||