Unterschiede
Hier werden die Unterschiede zwischen zwei Versionen angezeigt.
| Beide Seiten der vorigen Revision Vorhergehende Überarbeitung Nächste Überarbeitung | Vorhergehende Überarbeitung | ||
| electrical_engineering_and_electronics_1:block16 [2025/11/22 15:13] – mexleadmin | electrical_engineering_and_electronics_1:block16 [2026/01/10 12:46] (aktuell) – mexleadmin | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Zeile 1: | Zeile 1: | ||
| ====== Block 16 - Ampère' | ====== Block 16 - Ampère' | ||
| - | ===== Learning objectives | + | ===== 16.0 Intro ===== |
| + | |||
| + | ==== 16.0.1 | ||
| < | < | ||
| After this 90-minute block, you can | After this 90-minute block, you can | ||
| Zeile 7: | Zeile 9: | ||
| </ | </ | ||
| - | ===== Preparation at Home ===== | + | ==== 16.0.2 |
| Well, again | Well, again | ||
| Zeile 16: | Zeile 18: | ||
| * ... | * ... | ||
| - | ===== 90-minute plan ===== | + | ==== 16.0.3 |
| - Warm-up (x min): | - Warm-up (x min): | ||
| - .... | - .... | ||
| Zeile 24: | Zeile 26: | ||
| - Wrap-up (x min): Summary box; common pitfalls checklist. | - Wrap-up (x min): Summary box; common pitfalls checklist. | ||
| - | ===== Conceptual overview | + | ==== 16.0.4 |
| <callout icon=" | <callout icon=" | ||
| - ... | - ... | ||
| </ | </ | ||
| - | ===== Core content ===== | + | ===== 16.1 Core content ===== |
| - | ===== Generalization of the Magnetic Field Strength | + | ==== 16.1.1 |
| - | So far, only the rotational symmetric problem | + | So far, only the rotational symmetric problem |
| \begin{align*} | \begin{align*} | ||
| Zeile 43: | Zeile 45: | ||
| \begin{align*} | \begin{align*} | ||
| - | U = E \cdot s \quad \quad | \quad \text{applies to capacitor only} | + | U = E \cdot s \quad \quad | \quad \text{applies to plate capacitor only} |
| \end{align*} | \end{align*} | ||
| Zeile 57: | Zeile 59: | ||
| We can now try to look for similarities. Also for the magnetic field, the magnitude of the field strength is summed up along a path to arrive at another field-describing quantity. \\ | We can now try to look for similarities. Also for the magnetic field, the magnitude of the field strength is summed up along a path to arrive at another field-describing quantity. \\ | ||
| - | Because of the similarity the so-called **magnetic potential difference $V_m$** is introduced: | + | Because of the similarity the so-called **magnetic potential difference $V_m$** |
| \begin{align*} | \begin{align*} | ||
| Zeile 70: | Zeile 72: | ||
| We need to take a loser look here. Any closed path in the static electric field leads to a potential difference of $U = \oint \vec{E} \; {\rm d}\vec{s} =0$. \\ | We need to take a loser look here. Any closed path in the static electric field leads to a potential difference of $U = \oint \vec{E} \; {\rm d}\vec{s} =0$. \\ | ||
| BUT: closed paths in the static magnetic field leads to a magnetic potential difference which is **not mandatorily** $0$! $ V_m = \oint \vec{H} {\rm d}\vec{s} = \theta$ \\ \\ | BUT: closed paths in the static magnetic field leads to a magnetic potential difference which is **not mandatorily** $0$! $ V_m = \oint \vec{H} {\rm d}\vec{s} = \theta$ \\ \\ | ||
| - | Another new quantity is introduced: the **magnetic voltage $\theta$**. The magnetic voltage is the magnetic potential difference on a closed path. | + | Another new quantity is introduced: the **magnetic voltage $\theta$**: |
| + | - The magnetic voltage | ||
| + | - Since the magnetic voltage $\theta$ is valid for exactly __one turn__ along our single wire, $\theta$ is also equal to the current through the wire: \\ \begin{align*} \theta = H \cdot s = I \quad \quad | \quad \text{applies only to the long, straight conductor} \end{align*} | ||
| + | - The magnetic potential difference can take a fraction or a multiple of one turn and is therefore | ||
| + | - The magnetic voltage is generalized in the following box. | ||
| + | <callout icon=" | ||
| - | Now, what is the difference between the magnetic potential difference $V_m$ and the magnetic voltage $\theta$? | + | The path integral |
| - | - The first equation | + | |
| - | - The second equation | + | |
| - | Thus, for each infinitesimally small path ${\rm d}s$ along a field line, the resulting infinitesimally small magnetic | + | The magnetic |
| - | \begin{align*} | + | This leads to the **{{wp> |
| - | V_{\rm m12} = V_{\rm m}(\vec{s_1}, \vec{s_2}) | + | |
| - | = \int_\vec{s_1}^\vec{s_2} H(\vec{s}) {\rm d}s | + | | |
| + | |||
| + | The unit of the magnetic voltage $\theta$ is **Ampere** (or **Ampere-turns**). | ||
| + | |||
| + | In the english literature the magnetic voltage is called **{{wp> | ||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | <callout icon=" | ||
| + | ${\rm d}\vec{s}$ and ${\rm d}\vec{A}$ in $\oint_{s} \vec{H} {\rm d} \vec{s} = \theta = \iint_A \; \vec{S} {\rm d}\vec{A}$ build a right-hand system. \\ | ||
| + | - Once the thumb of the right hand is pointing along ${\rm d}\vec{A}$, the fingers of the right hand show the correct direction for ${\rm d}\vec{s}$ for positive $\vec{H}$ and $\vec{S}$ | ||
| + | - Currents into the direction of the right hand's thumb count positive. Currents antiparallel to it count negative. | ||
| + | |||
| + | < | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | {{drawio> | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | ~~PAGEBREAK~~ ~~CLEARFIX~~ | ||
| + | ==== 16.1.2 | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP group>< | ||
| + | === longitudinal coil === | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | {{url> | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | A longitudinal coil can be seen in <imgref BildNr04> | ||
| + | |||
| + | The created field density of the coil can be derived from Ampere' | ||
| + | |||
| + | \begin{align*} | ||
| + | \theta(t) &= \int & \vec{H}(t) \cdot {\rm d}\vec{s} \\ | ||
| + | &= \int & \vec{H}_{\rm inner}(t) \cdot {\rm d}\vec{s} & + & \int \vec{H}_{\rm outer}(t) \cdot {\rm d} \vec{s} | ||
| + | &= \int & \vec{H}(t) \cdot {\rm d}\vec{s} & + & 0 \\ | ||
| + | & | ||
| \end{align*} | \end{align*} | ||
| - | Up to now, only the situation was considered that one always walks along one single field line. $\vec{s}$ therefore always arrived at the same spot of the field line. | + | The magnetic field in a toroidal coil is often considered as homogenious in the inner volume, when the length |
| - | If one wants to extend this to arbitrary directions (also perpendicular to field lines), then only that part of the magnetic field strength $\vec{H}$ may be used in the formula, which is parallel to the path ${\rm d} \vec{s}$. This is made possible by scalar multiplication. Thus, it is generally valid: | + | With a given number $N$ of windings, the magnetic field strength $H$ is |
| \begin{align*} | \begin{align*} | ||
| - | \boxed{V_{\rm m12} = \int_\vec{s_1}^\vec{s_2} \vec{H} \cdot {\rm d} \vec{s}} | + | \theta = H \cdot l = N \cdot I |
| + | \end{align*} | ||
| + | \begin{align*} | ||
| + | \boxed{H = {{N \cdot I}\over{l}}} \biggr | _\text{longitudinal coil} | ||
| \end{align*} | \end{align*} | ||
| - | The magnetic voltage | + | </ |
| - | From the chapter [[electrical_engineering_2:The stationary Electric Flow]] | + | === toroidal coil === |
| - | This leads to the **{{wp> | + | < |
| + | < | ||
| + | {{url> | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | A toroidal coil has a donut-like setup. This can be seen in <imgref BildNr05> | ||
| + | The toroidal coil is often defined by: | ||
| + | * The minor radius | ||
| + | * The major radius $R$: The distance from the center | ||
| + | For reasons of symmetry, it shall get clear that the field lines form concentric circles. \\ | ||
| + | Also the magnetic field strength $H$ in a toroidal coil is often considered as homogenious, | ||
| \begin{align*} | \begin{align*} | ||
| - | \boxed{\oint_{s} | + | \theta = H \cdot 2\pi R = N \cdot I |
| + | \end{align*} | ||
| + | \begin{align*} | ||
| + | \boxed{H = {{N \cdot I}\over{2\pi R}}} \biggr | _\text{toroidal coil} | ||
| \end{align*} | \end{align*} | ||
| - | * The path integral of the magnetic field strength along an arbitrary closed path is equal to the free currents (= current density) through the surface enclosed by the path. | + | </ |
| - | * The magnetic voltage $\theta$ can be given as | + | |
| - | * for a single conductor: $\theta = I$ | + | |
| - | * for a coil: $\theta | + | ===== 16.2 Common pitfalls ===== |
| - | * for multiple conductors: $\theta | + | * ... |
| - | * for spatial distribution: | + | |
| - | * ${\rm d}\vec{s}$ and ${\rm d}\vec{A}$ build a right-hand system: once the thumb of the right hand is pointing along ${\rm d}\vec{A}$, the fingers of the right hand show the correct direction for ${\rm d}\vec{s}$ for positive $\vec{H}$ and $\vec{S}$ | + | ===== 16.3 Exercises ===== |
| + | |||
| + | <panel type=" | ||
| < | < | ||
| - | < | + | < |
| - | </ | + | </ |
| - | {{drawio> | + | {{drawio> |
| </ | </ | ||
| + | Given are the adjacent closed trajectories in the magnetic field of current-carrying conductors (see <imgref BildNr05> | ||
| - | ===== Common pitfalls | + | In each case, the magnetic potential difference $V_{\rm m}$ along the drawn path is sought. |
| - | * ... | + | |
| + | |||
| + | # | ||
| + | |||
| + | * The magnetic potential difference is given as the **sum of the current through the area within a closed path**. | ||
| + | * The direction of the current and the path have to be considered with the righthand rule. | ||
| + | |||
| + | # | ||
| + | |||
| + | # | ||
| + | a) $V_{\rm m,a} = - I_1 = - 2~\rm A$ \\ | ||
| + | # | ||
| + | |||
| + | # | ||
| + | b) $V_{\rm m,b} = - I_2 = - 4.5~\rm A$ \\ | ||
| + | # | ||
| + | |||
| + | # | ||
| + | c) $V_{\rm m,c} = 0 $ \\ | ||
| + | # | ||
| + | |||
| + | # | ||
| + | d) $V_{\rm m,d} = + I_1 - I_2 = 2~\rm A - 4.5~\rm A = - 2.5~\rm A$ \\ | ||
| + | # | ||
| + | |||
| + | # | ||
| + | e) $V_{\rm m,e} = + I_1 = + 2~\rm A$ \\ | ||
| + | # | ||
| + | |||
| + | # | ||
| + | f) $V_{\rm m,f} = 2 \cdot (- I_1) = - 4~\rm A$ \\ | ||
| + | # | ||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| - | ===== Exercises ===== | + | {{page> |
| - | ==== Worked examples ==== | + | {{page> |
| + | {{page> | ||
| - | ... | ||
| ===== Embedded resources ===== | ===== Embedded resources ===== | ||