Unterschiede

Hier werden die Unterschiede zwischen zwei Versionen angezeigt.

--- electrical_engineering_and_electronics_1:block18 [2025/11/23 19:47] – mexleadmin
+++ electrical_engineering_and_electronics_1:block18 [2025/12/06 13:47] (aktuell) – mexleadmin
@@ Zeile 1: / Zeile 1: @@
-====== Block 18 — Magnetic Circuits and Inductance ======
+====== Block 18 — Magnetic Flux and Inductivity ======
 ===== Learning objectives =====
@@ Zeile 14: / Zeile 14: @@
 For checking your understanding please do the following exercises:
-  * ...
+  * Exercise E3 Coil in a magnetic Field
+  * Exercise 4.1.2 Magnetic Field Strength around a horizontal straight Conductor
+  * Exercise 4.1.4 Effects of induction I
 ===== 90-minute plan =====
@@ Zeile 31: / Zeile 34: @@
 ===== Core content =====
-<callout> For this and the following chapter the online Book 'DC Electrical Circuit Analysis - A Practical Approach' is strongly recommended as a reference. In detail this is chapter [[https://eng.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Electrical_Engineering/Electronics/DC_Electrical_Circuit_Analysis_-_A_Practical_Approach_(Fiore)/10%3A_Magnetic_Circuits_and_Transformers/10.3%3A_Magnetic_Circuits|10.3 Magnetic Circuits]] </callout>
+We have been considering electric fields created by fixed charge distributions and magnetic fields produced by constant currents, but electromagnetic phenomena are not restricted to these stationary situations. Most of the interesting applications of electromagnetism are, in fact, time-dependent. To investigate some of these applications, we now remove the time-independent assumption we have been making and allow the fields to vary with time. In this and the next several chapters, you will see a wonderful symmetry in the behavior exhibited by time-varying electric and magnetic fields. Mathematically, this symmetry is expressed by an additional term in Ampère’s law and by another key equation of electromagnetism called Faraday’s law. We also discuss how moving a wire through a magnetic field produces a potential difference.
-In the previous chapters, we got accustomed to the magnetic field. During this path, some similarities from the magnetic field to the electric circuit appeared (see <imgref ImgNr01>).
+Lastly, we describe applications of these principles, such as the card reader shown in <imgref ImgNr01>. The black strip found on the back of credit cards and driver’s licenses is a very thin layer of magnetic material with information stored on it. Reading and writing the information on the credit card is done with a swiping motion. The physical reason why this is necessary is called electromagnetic induction and is discussed in this chapter.
-<WRAP> <imgcaption ImgNr01 | Similarities magnetic Circuit vs electric Circuit> </imgcaption> {{drawio>CompMagElCircuit.svg}} </WRAP>
+<WRAP> <imgcaption ImgNr01 | a Credit Card as an magnetic Application> </imgcaption> {{drawio>Creditcard.svg}} </WRAP>
-In this chapter, we will investigate how far we have come with such an analogy and where it can be practically applied.
+===== Recap of magnetic Field =====
-==== Flux ====
+The first productive experiments concerning the effects of time-varying magnetic fields were performed by Michael Faraday in 1831. One of his early experiments is represented in the simulation in <imgref ImgNr02> - in the tab ''Pickup Coil''. A potential difference is induced when the magnetic field in the coil is changed by pushing a bar magnet into or out of the coil. This potential difference can generate a current when the circuit is closed. Potential differences of opposite signs are produced by motion in opposite directions, and the directions of potential differences are also reversed by reversing poles. The same results are produced if the coil is moved rather than the magnet — it is the relative motion that is important. The faster the motion, the greater the potential difference, and there is no potential difference when the magnet is stationary relative to the coil.
+<WRAP> <imgcaption ImgNr02 | Movement of a magnet relative to a coil produces a potential difference.> </imgcaption>
+{{url>https://phet.colorado.edu/sims/cheerpj/faraday/latest/faraday.html?simulation=faraday 700,600 noborder}} </WRAP>
+Faraday also discovered that a similar effect can be produced using two circuits: a changing current in one circuit induces a current in a second, nearby circuit. An example of this can be shown in the simulation in the tab ''Transformer''. When the source is changed into AC and the coils are moved nearer together, the light bulb of the second circuit momentarily lights up, indicating that a short-lived current surge has been induced in that circuit.
+Faraday realized that in both experiments, a current flowed in the "receiving" circuit when the magnetic field in the region occupied by that circuit was changing. As the magnet was moved, the strength of its magnetic field at the loop changed; and when the current in the AC circuit changed periodically, the strength of its magnetic field at circuit 2 changed. Faraday was eventually able to interpret these and all other experiments involving magnetic fields that vary with time in terms of the following law:
+<callout icon="fa fa-exclamation" color="red" title="Notice:"> **Faraday's Law**
+Any change in the magnetic field or change in the orientation of the area of a coil with respect to the magnetic field induces an electric voltage. The induced potential difference is the negative change of the so-called **magnetic flux**  $\Phi_{\rm m}$ per unit of time. </callout>
 The magnetic flux is a measurement of the amount of magnetic field lines through a given surface area, as seen in <imgref ImgNr03>. The magnetic flux is the amount of magnetic field lines cutting through a surface area defined by the surface vector $\vec{A}$. If the angle between the $\vec{A} = A\cdot \vec{n}$ and magnetic field vector $\vec{B}$ is parallel or antiparallel, as shown in the diagram, the absolute value of the magnetic flux is the highest possible value given the values of the area and the magnetic field.
@@ Zeile 45: / Zeile 60: @@
 <WRAP> <imgcaption ImgNr03 | The magnetic flux is the amount of magnetic field lines cutting through a surface area A.> </imgcaption> {{drawio>MagneticFieldAndFlux.svg}} </WRAP>
-This definition leads to a magnetic flux similar to the electric flux studied earlier:
+This definition leads to a magnetic flux similar to the electric flux studied earlier in [[block14]]:
+\begin{align*} \Phi_{\rm m} = \iint_A \vec{B} \cdot {\rm d} \vec{A} \end{align*}
+Therefore, the induced electrical potential difference generated by a conductor or coil moving in a magnetic field is
+\begin{align*} \boxed{ u_{\rm ind} = -{{{\rm d} \Phi_{\rm m}}\over{{\rm d}t}} = -{{\rm d}\over{{\rm d}t}}\iint_A \vec{B} \cdot {\rm d} \vec{A} } \end{align*}
+The negative sign describes the direction in which the induced potential difference drives current around a circuit. However, that direction is most easily determined with a rule known as Lenz’s law, which we will discuss in the next subchapter.
+<imgref ImgNr05> depicts a circuit and an arbitrary surface $S$ that it bounds. Notice that $S$ is an open surface: The planar area bounded by the circuit is not part of the surface, so it is not fully enclosing a volume.
+Since the magnetic field is a source-free vortex field, the flux over a closed area is always zero: $\Phi_{\rm m} = {\rlap{\Large \rlap{\int} \int} \, \LARGE \circ}_{A} \vec{B} \cdot {\rm d} \vec{A} = 0$. \\
+By this, it can be shown that any open surface bounded by the circuit in question can be used to evaluate $\Phi_{\rm m}$ (similar to the [[:electrical_engineering_2:the_stationary_electric_flow#gauss_s_law_for_current_density|Gauss's law for current density]]).
+For example, $\Phi_{\rm m}$ is the same for the various surfaces $S$, $S_1$, $S_2$ of the figure.
+<WRAP> <imgcaption ImgNr05 | A circuit bounding an arbitrary open surface S. > </imgcaption> {{drawio>FluxThroughSurfaces.svg}} </WRAP>
+The SI unit for magnetic flux is the $\rm Weber$ (Wb), \begin{align*} [\Phi_{\rm m}] = [B] \cdot [A] = 1 ~\rm  T \cdot m^2 = 1 ~ Wb \end{align*}
+Based on this definition, the magnetic field unit is occasionally expressed as Weber per square meter ($\rm Wb/m^2$) instead of teslas.
+In many practical applications, the circuit of interest consists of a number $N$ of tightly wound turns (similar to <imgref ImgNr06>).
+Each turn experiences the same magnetic flux $\Phi_{\rm m}$.
+Therefore, the net magnetic flux through the circuits is $N$ times the flux through one turn, and Faraday’s law is written as
 \begin{align*}
-\Phi_{\rm m} = \iint_A \vec{B} \cdot {\rm d} \vec{A}
+u_{\rm ind} = -        { {\rm d}              \over{{\rm d}t}} (N \cdot \Phi_{\rm m})
+            = -N \cdot {{{\rm d} \Phi_{\rm m}}\over{{\rm d}t}}
 \end{align*}
+==== Lenz Law ====
-<imgref ImgNr05> depicts a circuit and an arbitrary surface $S$ that it bounds. Notice that $S$ is an open surface: The planar area bounded by the circuit is not part of the surface, so it is not fully enclosing a volume.
+The direction in which the induced potential difference drives current around a wire loop can be found through the negative sign. However, it is usually easier to determine this direction with Lenz’s law, named in honor of its discoverer, Heinrich Lenz (1804–1865). (Faraday also discovered this law, independently of Lenz.) We state Lenz’s law as follows:
-Since the magnetic field is a source-free vortex field, the flux over a closed area is always zero:
+<callout icon="fa fa-exclamation" color="red" title="Notice:"> **Lenz's Law**
+The direction of the induced potential difference drives current around a wire loop to always oppose the change in magnetic flux that causes the potential difference. </callout>
+Lenz’s law can also be considered in terms of the conservation of energy. If pushing a magnet into a coil causes current, the energy in that current must have come from somewhere. If the induced current causes a magnetic field opposing the increase in the field of the magnet we pushed in, then the situation is clear. We pushed a magnet against a field and did work on the system, and that showed up as current. If it were not the case that the induced field opposes the change in the flux, the magnet would be pulled in produce a current without anything having done work. Electric potential energy would have been created, violating the conservation of energy.
+To determine an induced potential difference $u_{\rm ind}$, you first calculate the magnetic flux $\Phi_{\rm m}$ and then obtain ${\rm d}\Phi_{\rm m} / {\rm d}t$. The magnitude of $u_{\rm ind}$ is given by
+\begin{align*} |u_{\rm ind}| &= \left|-{{\rm d}\over{{\rm d}t}}\Phi_{\rm m}\right| \end{align*}
+Finally, you can apply Lenz’s law to determine the sense of $u_{\rm ind}$. This will be developed through examples that illustrate the following problem-solving strategy.
+<callout icon="fa fa-exclamation" color="red" title="Notice:"> **Problem-Solving Strategy: Lenz’s Law**
+To use Lenz’s law to determine the directions of induced potential difference, currents, and magnetic fields:
+  - Make a sketch of the situation to visualize and record the directions of fields, movements etc. .
+  - Determine the direction of the applied magnetic field $\vec{B}$.
+  - Determine whether the magnitude of its magnetic flux is increasing or decreasing.
+  - Now determine the direction of the induced magnetic field $\vec{B_{\rm ind}}$. \\ The induced magnetic field attempts to withstand its cause: It tries to strengthen a decreasing magnetic flux (or to counteract an increasing magnetic flux). Therefore, the induced magnetic field adds or subtracts from the applied magnetic field, depending on the change in magnetic flux.
+  - Use the right-hand rule to determine the direction of the induced current $i_{\rm ind}$ that is responsible for the induced magnetic field $\vec{B}_{\rm ind}$.
+  - The direction (or polarity) of the induced potential difference can now drive a conventional current in this direction.
+</callout>
+Let’s apply Lenz’s law to the system of <imgref ImgNr06>. We designate the “front” of the closed conducting loop as the region containing the approaching bar magnet, and the “back” of the loop as the other region. The north pole of the magnet moves toward the loop. Therefore, the flux through the loop due to the field of the magnet increases because the strength of field lines directed from the front to the back of the loop is increasing. A current is consequently induced in the loop. By Lenz’s law, the direction of the induced current must be such that its own magnetic field is directed in a way to oppose the changing flux caused by the field of the approaching magnet. Hence, the induced current circulates so that its magnetic field lines through the loop are directed from the back to the front of the loop. By the right-hand rule, place your thumb pointing against the magnetic field lines, which is toward the bar magnet. Your fingers wrap in a counterclockwise direction as viewed from the bar magnet. Alternatively, we can determine the direction of the induced current by treating the current loop as an electromagnet that opposes the approach of the north pole of the bar magnet. This occurs when the induced current flows as shown, for then the face of the loop nearer the approaching magnet is also a north pole.
+<WRAP> <imgcaption ImgNr06 | The change in magnetic flux caused by the approaching magnet induces a current in the loop.> </imgcaption> {{drawio>CoilInductionExample.svg}} </WRAP>
+Part (b) of the figure shows the south pole of a magnet moving toward a conducting loop. In this case, the flux through the loop due to the field of the magnet increases because the number of field lines directed from the back to the front of the loop is increasing. To oppose this change, a current is induced in the loop whose field lines through the loop are directed from the front to the back. Equivalently, we can say that the current flows in a direction so that the face of the loop nearer the approaching magnet is a south pole, which then repels the approaching south pole of the magnet. By the right-hand rule, your thumb points away from the bar magnet. Your fingers wrap in a clockwise fashion, which is the direction of the induced current.
+An animation of this situation can be seen [[https://www.glowscript.org/#/user/matterandinteractions/folder/matterandinteractions/program/22-Faraday-magnet|here]].
+==== Moving single Charge in a magnetic Field ====
+Instead of a current in the magnetic field, we will now have a look on a charge moving in the magnetic field. \\
+Since the electical current $I$ is based on a moving charge ($I = {{dQ}\over{dt}}$), also a moving charge has to feel a force. \\
+To find this force the force onto a conductor can be used as a start (see [[block17]]). However, the formula will be investigated infinitesimally for small parts ${\rm d} \vec{l}$ of the conductor:
+\begin{align*}
+\vec{{\rm d}F}_{\rm L} = I \cdot {\rm d}\vec{l} \times \vec{B}
+\end{align*}
+The current is now substituted by $I = {\rm d}Q/{\rm d}t$, where ${\rm d}Q$ is the small charge packet in the length $\vec{{\rm d}l}$ of the conductor.
+\begin{align*}
+\vec{{\rm d}F}_{\rm L} = {{{\rm d}Q}\over{{\rm d}t}} \cdot {\rm d}\vec{l} \times \vec{B}
+\end{align*}
+Mathematically not quite correct, but in a physical way true the following rearrangement can be done:
+\begin{align*}
+\vec{{\rm d}F}_{\rm L} &= {{{\rm d}Q \cdot   {\rm d}\vec{l}}\over{{\rm d}t}} \times \vec{B} \\
+                       &= {\rm d}Q   \cdot {{{\rm d}\vec{l}}\over{{\rm d}t}} \times \vec{B} \\
+                       &= {\rm d}Q   \cdot {{{\rm d}\vec{l}}\over{{\rm d}t}} \times \vec{B} \\
+\end{align*}
+Here, the part ${{{\rm d}\vec{l}}\over{{\rm d}t}}$ represents the speed $\vec{v}$ of the small charge packet ${\rm d}Q$.
+\begin{align*}
+\vec{{\rm d}F}_{\rm L} &= {\rm d}Q \cdot \vec{v} \times \vec{B}
+\end{align*}
+The **Lorenz Force** on a finite charge packet is the integration:
+\begin{align*}
+\boxed{\vec{F}_{\rm L} = Q \cdot \vec{v} \times \vec{B}}
+\end{align*}
+<callout icon="fa fa-exclamation" color="red" title="Notice:">
+  * A charge $Q$ moving with a velocity $\vec{v}$ in a magnetic field $\vec{B}$ experiences a force of $\vec{F_{\rm L}}$.
+  * The direction of the force is given by the right-hand rule.
+  * The true Lorentz force is not the force on the whole conductor but the single force onto an (elementary) charge.
+</callout>
+==== Moving single Rod in a magnetic Field ====
+Coming from a single free charge, let us have a look onto free charges in a conductor, when the conductor is moving. \\
+These are also free to move within the borders of the conducting material and the given fields. \\
+The first step to investigate the motional induction is shown in <imgref ImgNr09>: a single conducting rod with the length $\vec{l}$ is moving with a constant velocity $\vec{v}$ through a homogenous magnetic field $\vec{B} \perp \vec{v} \perp \vec{l}$.
+  * The charges in the rod experience the Lorentz force $\vec{F}_{\rm L}$.
+  * By this force, the positive charges move to one end of the rod and the negative to the other one.
+  * The separated charges create a potential difference and by this, a Coulomb force $\vec{F}_{\rm C}$ onto the charges within the rod.
+  * For a constant speed, the Lorentz force onto charges in the rod must have the same magnitude as the Coulomb force.
+<WRAP> <imgcaption ImgNr09 | motional Induction on a single Rod> </imgcaption> {{drawio>MotionalInductionExampleRod.svg}} </WRAP>
+This leads to:
 \begin{align*}
-\Phi_{\rm m} = {\rlap{\Large \rlap{\int} \int} \, \LARGE \circ}_{A} \vec{B} \cdot {\rm d} \vec{A} = 0
+\vec{F}_{\rm C}   &= - \vec{F}_{\rm L} \\ Q \cdot \vec{E}_{\rm ind}
+                  &= - Q \cdot \vec{v} \times \vec{B} \\
+\vec{E}_{\rm ind} &= - \vec{v} \times \vec{B} \\
 \end{align*}
-By this, it can be shown that any open surface bounded by the circuit in question can be used to evaluate $\Phi_{\rm m}$.
+The induced potential difference in the rod will be:
-For example, $\Phi_{\rm m}$ is the same for the various surfaces $S$, $S_1$, $S_2$ of the figure.
-<WRAP> <imgcaption ImgNr05 | A circuit bounding an arbitrary open surface S. > </imgcaption> {{drawio>FluxThroughSurfaces.svg}} </WRAP>
+\begin{align*}
+u_{\rm ind} &=   \int_l \vec{E}_{\rm ind}        \cdot {\rm d} \vec{s} \\
+            &= - \int^0_1 \vec{v} \times \vec{B} \cdot {\rm d} \vec{s} \\
+\end{align*}
-The SI unit for magnetic flux is the $\rm Weber$ (Wb), \begin{align*} [\Phi_{\rm m}] = [B] \cdot [A] = 1 ~\rm  T \cdot m^2 = 1 ~ Wb \end{align*}
+For constant $|\vec{v}|$ and $|\vec{B}|$ this leads to:
+\begin{align*}
+u_{\rm ind} &= - v \cdot B \cdot l \\
+\end{align*}
-If the $B$ field is homogenous and $B$ is perpendicular to the surface $S$, then the fomula simplifies to:
+==== Rod in Circuit ====
+Now let’s look at the conducting rod pulled in a circuit, changing magnetic flux. The area enclosed by the circuit '0123' of <imgref ImgNr08> is $l\cdot x$ and is perpendicular to the magnetic field.
+<WRAP> <imgcaption ImgNr08 | Example for calculating the motional Induction> </imgcaption> {{drawio>MotionalInductionExampleCalc.svg}} </WRAP>
+The velocity of the rod is $v={\rm d}x/{\rm d}t$. So the induced potential difference will get
 \begin{align*}
-\Phi_{\rm m} = B \cdot A
+u_{\rm ind} &= - v \cdot B \cdot l \\
+            &= - {{{\rm d}x}\over{{\rm d}t}} \cdot B \cdot l \\
+            &= - {{B \cdot l \cdot {\rm d}x}\over{{\rm d}t}} \\
+            &= - {{B \cdot {\rm d}A}\over{{\rm d}t}} \\
+\end{align*}
+\begin{align*}
+\boxed{u_{\rm ind}= - {{{\rm d}\Phi_{\rm m}}\over{{\rm d}t}} }
 \end{align*}
+This is an alternative way to deduce Faraday's Law.
-Based on this definition, the magnetic field unit is occasionally expressed as Weber per square meter ($\rm Wb/m^2$) instead of teslas.
+The current $i_{\rm ind}$ induced in the given circuit is $u_{\rm ind}$ divided by the resistance $R$
-In many practical applications, the circuit of interest consists of a number $N$ of tightly wound turns (similar to <imgref ImgNr06>).
-Each turn experiences the same magnetic flux $\Phi_{\rm m}$.
+\begin{align*}
-Therefore, the net magnetic flux through the circuits is $N$ times the flux through one turn, and Faraday’s law is written as
+i_{\rm ind} = {{v \cdot B \cdot l }\over{R}}
+\end{align*}
+Furthermore, the direction of the induced potential difference satisfies Lenz’s law, as you can verify by inspection of the figure.
+The situation of the single rod can be interpreted in the following way: We can calculate a motionally induced potential difference with Faraday’s law even when an actual closed circuit is not present. We simply imagine an enclosed area whose boundary includes the moving conductor, calculate $\Phi_{\rm m}$, and then find the potential difference from Faraday’s law. For example, we can let the moving rod of <imgref ImgNr10> be one side of the imaginary rectangular area represented by the dashed lines. The area of the rectangle is $A = l \cdot x$, so the magnetic flux through it is $\Phi= B\cdot l \cdot x$. Differentiating this equation, we obtain
+\begin{align*}
+u_{\rm ind} &= - {{\rm d}\over{{\rm dt}}} \cdot \Phi_{\rm m} \\
+            &= - B \cdot l \cdot {{{\rm d}x}\over{{\rm d}t}} \\
+            &= - B \cdot l \cdot v \\
+\end{align*}
+which is identical to the potential difference between the ends of the rod that we determined earlier.
 ==== Linked Flux ====
@@ Zeile 107: / Zeile 268: @@
 </callout>
-==== Basics for Linear Magnetic Circuits ====
+===== Common pitfalls =====
+  * ...
-For the upcoming calculations, the following assumptions are made
+===== Exercises =====
-  - The relationship between $B$ and $H$ is linear: $B = \mu \cdot H$ \\ This is a good estimation when the magnetic field strength lays well below saturation
+{{page>electrical_engineering_and_electronics:task_rdz03rspbwusy7wk_with_calculation&nofooter}}
-  - There is no stray field leaking out of the magnetic field conducting material.
+{{page>electrical_engineering_and_electronics:task_ludzwiuhjxitz85b_with_calculation&nofooter}}
-  - The fields inside of airgaps are homogeneous. This is true for small air gaps.
-One can calculate a lot of simple magnetic circuits when these assumptions are applied and focusing on the average field line are applied.
-<WRAP> <imgcaption ImgNr03 | Simplifications and Linearization> </imgcaption> {{drawio>SimplificationLin.svg}} </WRAP>
+<panel type="info" title="Exercise 4.1.4 Effects of induction I"> <WRAP group><WRAP column 2%>{{fa>pencil?32}}</WRAP><WRAP column 92%>
-Two simple magnetic circuits are shown in <imgref ImgNr02>: They consist of
+A change of magnetic flux is passing a coil with a single winding. The following pictures <imgref ImgNrEx01> show different flux-time-diagrams as examples.
-  * a current-carrying coil
+  * Create for each $\Phi(t)$-diagram the corresponding $u_{\rm ind}(t)$-diagram!
-  * a ferrite core
+  * Write down each maximum value of $u_{\rm ind}(t)$
-  * an airgap (in picture (2) + (3) ).
-<WRAP> <imgcaption ImgNr02 | A simple magnetic Circuit> </imgcaption> {{drawio>SimpleMagnCircuit.svg}} </WRAP>
+<WRAP> <imgcaption ImgNrEx01| Flux-Time-Diagrams> </imgcaption> <WRAP> {{drawio>FluxTimeDia1.svg}} \\ </WRAP></WRAP>
-These three parts will be investigated shortly:
+<button size="xs" type="link" collapse="Solution_4_1_4_1_Solution">{{icon>eye}} Solution for (a)</button><collapse id="Solution_4_1_4_1_Solution" collapsed="true">
-<WRAP group><WRAP column third>
+For partwise linear $u_{\rm ind}$ one can derive:
-=== Current-carrying Coil ===
+\begin{align*}
+u_{\rm ind} &= -{{{\rm d}\Phi}\over{{\rm d}t}} \\
+            &= -{{\Delta \Phi}\over{\Delta t}}
+\end{align*}
-For the magnetic circuit, the coil is parameterized only by:
+For diagram (a):
-  * its number of windings $N$ and
+  * $t= 0.0 ... 0.6 ~\rm s$: $u_{\rm ind} = -{{0 ~\rm Vs}\over{0.6 ~\rm s}}= 0$
-  * the passing current $i$.
+  * $t= 0.6 ... 1.5 ~\rm s$: $u_{\rm ind} = -{{-3.75\cdot 10^{-3} ~\rm Vs}\over{0.9 ~\rm s}}= +4.17 ~\rm mV$
+  * $t= 1.5 ... 2.1 ~\rm s$: $u_{\rm ind} = -{{0 ~\rm Vs}\over{0.6 ~\rm s}}= 0$
-These parameters lead to the magnetic voltage $\theta = N\cdot i$.
+</collapse>
-</WRAP><WRAP column third>
+<button size="xs" type="link" collapse="Solution_4_1_4_1_Finalresult">
-=== Ferrite Core ===
+{{icon>eye}} Final result for (a)</button><collapse id="Solution_4_1_4_1_Finalresult" collapsed="true">
+<WRAP> <imgcaption ImgNrEx01| Flux-Time-Diagrams Solution> </imgcaption> <WRAP> {{drawio>FluxTimeDia1Solution.svg}} \\
+</WRAP></WRAP> \\
+</collapse>
-  * The core is assumed to be made of ferromagnetic material.
+</WRAP></WRAP></panel>
-  * Therefore, the relative permeability in the core is much larger than in air ($\mu_{\rm r,core}\gg 1$).
-  * The ferrite core is also filling the inside of the current-carrying coil.
-  * The ferrite core conducts the magnetic flux around the magnetic circuit (and by this: also to the airgap)
-</WRAP><WRAP column third>
+<panel type="info" title="Exercise 4.1.5 Effects of induction II"> <WRAP group><WRAP column 2%>{{fa>pencil?32}}</WRAP><WRAP column 92%>
-=== Airgap ===
-  * The air gap interrupts the ferrite core.
+A changing of magnetic flux is passing a coil with a single winding and induces the voltage $u_{\rm ind}(t)$.
-  * The width of the air gap is small compared to the dimensions of the cross-section of the ferrite core.
+The following pictures <imgref ImgNrEx02> show different voltage-time diagrams as examples.
-  * The field in the air gap can be used to generate (mechanical) effects within the air gap. \\ An example of this can be the force onto a permanent magnet (see <imgref ImgNr02> (3)).
-</WRAP></WRAP>
+  * Create for each $u_{\rm ind}(t)$-diagram the corresponding $\Phi(t)$-diagram!
+  * Write down each maximum value of $\Phi(t)$
-==== Reluctance - the magnetic Resistance ====
+Note the given start value $\Phi_0$ for each flux.
-We also assume that the magnetic flux $\Phi$ remains constant along the ferrite core and in the air gap, so $\Phi_{\rm airgap}=\Phi_{\rm core}=\rm const.$. \\
+<WRAP> <imgcaption ImgNrEx02| Voltage-Time-Diagrams> </imgcaption> <WRAP> {{drawio>FluxTimeDia2.svg}} \\ </WRAP></WRAP>
-The relationship $B=\mu \cdot H$, and $\mu_{\rm core}\gg\mu_{\rm airgap}$ lead to the fact that the ${H}$-Field must be much stronger within the airgap (<imgref ImgNr04> (3)).
+#@HiddenBegin_HTML~415_1S,Solution for (a)~@#
-<WRAP> <imgcaption ImgNr04 | B- and H-field along the ferrite core> </imgcaption> {{drawio>BHfieldFerriteCoreSimple.svg}}</WRAP>
+For partwise linear $u_{\rm ind}$ one can derive:
+\begin{align*}
+u_{\rm ind}        &= -{{{\rm d}\Phi}\over{{\rm d}t}} \\
+\rightarrow  \Phi  &= -\int_0^t{ u_{\rm ind} \;{\rm d}t} \\
+\Phi               &= \Phi_0 -\sum_k {u_{{\rm ind},~k} \; \Delta t} \\
+\end{align*}
+For diagram (a):
+  * $t= 0.00 ... 0.04 ~\rm s\quad$: $\quad \Phi = \Phi_0 - {0 \cdot \; \Delta t} \quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad= 0 ~\rm Wb$
+  * $t= 0.04 ... 0.10 ~\rm s\quad$: $\quad \Phi =   0 {~\rm Wb} - {{30 ~\rm mV} \cdot \; (t - 0.04 ~\rm s)} = \quad {1.2 ~\rm mWb} - t \cdot 30 ~\rm mV$
+  * $t= 0.10 ... 0.14 ~\rm s\quad$: $\quad \Phi =   {1.2 ~\rm mWb} - {0.10 ~\rm s} \cdot 30 ~\rm mV \quad = - {1.8 ~\rm mWb}$
+#@HiddenEnd_HTML~415_1S,Solution ~@#
-===== Common pitfalls =====
+#@HiddenBegin_HTML~415_1R,Result for (a)~@#
-  * ...
+{{drawio>FluxTimeDia2Res.svg}}
+#@HiddenEnd_HTML~415_1R,Result~@#
-===== Exercises =====
-{{page>electrical_engineering_and_electronics:task_yp4rbdlj8kktyrhp_with_calculation&nofooter}}
+</WRAP></WRAP></panel>
-{{page>electrical_engineering_and_electronics:task_n1kwu944m7jac3tf_with_calculation&nofooter}}
-{{page>electrical_engineering_and_electronics:task_0j7accfimmemytq9_with_calculation&nofooter}}
+<panel type="info" title="Exercise 4.1.1 Magnetic Field Strength around a horizontal straight Conductor"> <WRAP group><WRAP column 2%>{{fa>pencil?32}}</WRAP><WRAP column 92%>
+The square coil of <imgref ImgNr06> has sides $l=0.25~\rm m$ long and is tightly wound with $N=200$ turns of wire. The resistance of the coil is $R=5.0~\Omega$. The coil is placed in a spatially uniform magnetic field. The field is directed perpendicular to the face of the coil and whose magnitude is decreasing at a rate ${\rm d}B/{\rm d}t=−0.040~ \rm T/s$.
+  - What is the magnitude of the potential difference induced in the coil?
+  - What is the magnitude of the current circulating through the coil?
+<WRAP> <imgcaption ImgNr06 | A square coil with N turns of wire with uniform magnetic field B directed in the downward direction, perpendicular to the coil> </imgcaption> {{drawio>CoilExample.svg}} </WRAP>
+<button size="xs" type="link" collapse="Solution_4_1_1_1_Strategy">{{icon>eye}} Strategy</button><collapse id="Solution_4_1_1_1_Strategy" collapsed="true">
+The surface $\vec{A}$ is perpendicular to the area covering the loop. We will choose this to be pointing downward so that $\vec{B}$ is parallel to $\vec{A}$ and that the flux turns into the multiplication of magnetic field times area. The area of the loop is not changing in time, so it can be factored out of the time derivative, leaving the magnetic field as the only quantity varying in time. Lastly, we can apply Ohm’s law once we know the induced potential difference to find the current in the loop. </collapse>
+<button size="xs" type="link" collapse="Solution_4_1_1_1_Solution">{{icon>eye}} Solution</button><collapse id="Solution_4_1_1_1_Solution" collapsed="true">
+The flux through one turn is
+\begin{align*} \Phi_{\rm m} = B \cdot A \end{align*}
+We can calculate the magnitude of the potential difference $|u_{\rm ind}|$ from Faraday’s law:
+\begin{align*}
+|u_{\rm ind}| &= |-        {{\rm d}\over{{\rm d}t}}(N \cdot \Phi_{\rm m})| \\
+              &= |-N \cdot {{\rm d}\over{{\rm d}t}}(B \cdot A)           | \\
+              &= |-N \cdot l^2 \cdot {{{\rm d}B}\over{{\rm d}t}}| \\
+              &= (200)(0.25 ~\rm m)^2(0.040 ~T/s) \\
+              &= 0.50 ~V
+\end{align*}
+The magnitude of the current induced in the coil is
+\begin{align*}
+|I| &= {{ |u_{\rm ind}|}\over{R}} \\
+    &= {{0.50 ~\rm V}\over{5.0 ~\Omega}} = 0.10 ~\rm A \\
+\end{align*}
+</collapse> </WRAP></WRAP></panel>
+<panel type="info" title="Exercise 4.1.2 Magnetic Field Strength around a horizontal straight Conductor"> <WRAP group><WRAP column 2%>{{fa>pencil?32}}</WRAP><WRAP column 92%>
+A closely wound coil has a radius of $4.0 ~\rm cm$, $50$ turns, and a total resistance of $40~\Omega$.
+At what rate must a magnetic field perpendicular to the face of the coil change in order to produce Joule heating in the coil at a rate of $2.0 ~\rm mW$?
+<button size="xs" type="link" collapse="Solution_4_1_2_1_Result">{{icon>eye}} Result</button><collapse id="Solution_4_1_2_1_Result" collapsed="true">
+$1.1 ~\rm T/s$ </collapse> </WRAP></WRAP></panel>
+<panel type="info" title="Exercise 4.3.1 Calculating the Large Motional Potential difference of an Object in Orbit"> <WRAP group><WRAP column 2%>{{fa>pencil?32}}</WRAP><WRAP column 92%>
+Calculate the potential difference motionally induced along a $20.0 ~\rm km$ conductor moving at an orbital speed of $7.80 ~\rm km/s$ perpendicular to Earth’s $5.00 \cdot 10^{-5} ~\rm T$ magnetic field.
+<button size="xs" type="link" collapse="Solution_4_3_1_1_Solution">{{icon>eye}} Solution</button><collapse id="Solution_4_3_1_1_Solution" collapsed="true">
+This is a great example of using the equation motional $u_{\rm ind} = - B \cdot l \cdot v$
+Entering the given values into $u_{\rm ind} = - B \cdot l \cdot v$ gives
+\begin{align*}
+u_{ind} &= - {{{\rm d} \Phi_{\rm m}}\over{{\rm d}t}} \\
+        &= - B \cdot l \cdot v \\
+        &= - (5.00 \cdot 10^{-5}~\rm T)(20.0 \cdot 10^{3} ~\rm m)(7.80\cdot 10^{3} ~\rm m/s) \\
+\end{align*}
+</collapse>
+<button size="xs" type="link" collapse="Solution_4_3_1_1_Result">{{icon>eye}} Result</button><collapse id="Solution_4_3_1_1_Result" collapsed="true">
+\begin{align*} u_{\rm ind} &= - 7.80 \cdot 10^3 ~\rm V \\ \end{align*}
+</collapse>
+</WRAP></WRAP></panel>
+<panel type="info" title="Exercise 4.3.2 A Metal Rod Rotating in a Magnetic Field"> <WRAP group><WRAP column 2%>{{fa>pencil?32}}</WRAP><WRAP column 92%>
+Part (a) of <imgref ImgNr11> shows a metal rod $\rm OS$ that is rotating in a horizontal plane around point $\rm O$.
+The rod slides along a wire that forms a circular arc $\rm PST$ of radius $r$. The system is in a constant magnetic field $\vec{B}$ that is directed out of the page.
+If you rotate the rod at a constant angular velocity $\omega$, what is the current $I_{\rm ind}$ in the closed loop $\rm OPSO$?
+Assume that the resistor $R$ furnishes all of the resistance in the closed loop.
+<WRAP> <imgcaption ImgNr11 | motional Induction on a rotating single Rod> </imgcaption> {{drawio>MotionalInductionExampleRodRotating}} </WRAP>
+<button size="xs" type="link" collapse="Solution_4_3_2_1_Strategy">{{icon>eye}} Strategy</button><collapse id="Solution_4_3_2_1_Strategy" collapsed="true">
+The magnetic flux is the magnetic field times the area of the quarter circle or $A = r^2 \varphi /2$. When finding the potential difference through Faraday’s law, all variables are constant in time but $\varphi$, with $\omega = {\rm d}\varphi/{\rm d}t$. To calculate the work per unit time, we know this is related to the torque times the angular velocity. The torque is calculated by knowing the force on a rod and integrating it over the length of the rod. </collapse>
+<button size="xs" type="link" collapse="Solution_4_3_2_1_Solution">{{icon>eye}} Solution</button><collapse id="Solution_4_3_2_1_Solution" collapsed="true">
+From geometry, the area of the loop $\rm OPSO$ is $A=r^2\varphi /2$. Hence, the magnetic flux through the loop is
+\begin{align*}
+\Phi_{\rm m} &= B\cdot A \\
+             &= B\cdot {{r^2\varphi}\over{2}} \\
+\end{align*}
+Differentiating with respect to time and using $\omega = d\varphi/dt$ , we have
+\begin{align*}
+u_{\rm ind} &= |{{\rm d}\over{{\rm d}t}} \cdot \Phi_{\rm m} | \\
+            &= B\cdot {{r^2\omega}\over{2}}
+\end{align*}
+When divided by the resistance $R$ of the loop, this yields the magnitude of the induced current
+\begin{align*}
+i_{\rm ind} &= {{|u_{\rm ind}|}\over{R}} \\
+            &= B\cdot {{r^2\omega}\over{2R}}
+\end{align*}
+As $\varphi$ increases, so does the flux through the loop due to $\vec{B}$. To counteract this increase, the magnetic field due to the induced current must be directed into the page in the region enclosed by the loop. Therefore, as part (b) of <imgref ImgNr11> illustrates, the current circulates clockwise. </collapse>
+</WRAP></WRAP></panel>
+<panel type="info" title="Exercise 4.3.3 A Rectangular Coil Rotating in a Magnetic Field"> <WRAP group><WRAP column 2%>{{fa>pencil?32}}</WRAP><WRAP column 92%>
+The following example is the basis for an electric generator: A rectangular coil of area $A$ and $N$ turns is placed in a uniform magnetic field $\vec{B}$, as shown in <imgref ImgNr12>.
+The coil is rotated about the $z$-axis through its center at a constant angular velocity $\omega$.
+Obtain an expression for the induced potential difference $u_{\rm ind}$ in the coil.
+<WRAP> <imgcaption ImgNr12 | A rectangular coil rotating in a uniform magnetic field> </imgcaption> {{drawio>MotionalInductionExampleCoilRotating2}} </WRAP>
+<button size="xs" type="link" collapse="Solution_4_3_3_1_Strategy">{{icon>eye}} Strategy</button><collapse id="Solution_4_3_3_1_Strategy" collapsed="true">
+According to the diagram, the angle between the surface vector $\vec{A}$ and the magnetic field $\vec{B}$ is $\varphi$. The dot product of $\vec{A} \cdot \vec{B}$ simplifies to only the $\cos \varphi$ component of the magnetic field times the area, namely where the magnetic field projects onto the unit surface vector $\vec{A}$. The magnitude of the magnetic field and the area of the loop are fixed over time, which makes the integration simpler. The induced potential difference is written out using Faraday’s law. </collapse>
+<button size="xs" type="link" collapse="Solution_4_3_3_1_Solution">{{icon>eye}} Solution</button><collapse id="Solution_4_3_3_1_Solution" collapsed="true">
+When the coil is in a position such that its surface vector $\vec{A}$ makes an angle $\varphi$ with the magnetic field $\vec{B}$ the magnetic flux through a single turn of the coil is
+\begin{align*}
+\Phi_{\rm m} &= \iint \vec{B} {\rm d}\vec{A} \\
+             &= BA\cdot \cos \varphi \\
+\end{align*}
+From Faraday’s law, the induced potential difference in the coil is
+\begin{align*}
+u_{\rm ind} &= - N {{\rm d}\over{{\rm d}t}} \Phi_{\rm m} \\
+            &= NBA \cdot \sin \varphi \cdot {{{\rm d}\varphi}\over{{\rm d}t}}
+\end{align*}
+The constant angular velocity is $\omega = {\rm d}\varphi/{\rm d}t$. The angle $\varphi$ represents the time evolution of the angular velocity or $\omega t$.
+This changes the function to time-space rather than $\varphi$. The induced potential difference, therefore, varies sinusoidally with time according to
+\begin{align*} u_{\rm ind} &= U_{\rm ind,0} \cdot \sin \omega t \end{align*}
+where $U_{\rm ind,0} = NBA\omega$. </collapse>
+</WRAP></WRAP></panel>
+<panel type="info" title="Exercise 4.3.4 Calculating the Potential Difference Induced in a Generator Coil"> <WRAP group><WRAP column 2%>{{fa>pencil?32}}</WRAP><WRAP column 92%>
+The generator coil shown in <imgref ImgNr13> is rotated through one-fourth of a revolution (from $\varphi_0=0°$ to $\varphi_1=90°$) in $5.0 ~\rm ms$.
+The $200$-turn circular coil has a $5.00 ~\rm cm$ radius and is in a uniform $0.80 ~\rm T$ magnetic field.
+What is the value of the induced potential difference?
+<WRAP> <imgcaption ImgNr13 | When this generator coil is rotated through one-fourth of a revolution, the magnetic flux changes from its maximum to zero, inducing a potential difference.> </imgcaption> {{drawio>MotionalInductionExampleCoilRotating.svg}} </WRAP>
+<button size="xs" type="link" collapse="Solution_4_3_4_1_Strategy">{{icon>eye}} Strategy</button><collapse id="Solution_4_3_4_1_Strategy" collapsed="true">
+Faraday’s law of induction is used to find the potential difference induced:
+\begin{align*}
+u_{\rm ind} &= - N {{{\rm d} \Phi_{\rm m}}\over{{\rm d}t}}
+\end{align*}
+We recognize this situation as the same one in the exercise before.
+According to the diagram, the projection of the surface vector $\vec{A}$ to the magnetic field is initially ${A}\cdot \cos \varphi$, and this is inserted by the definition of the dot product.
+The magnitude of the magnetic field and the area of the loop are fixed over time, which makes the integration simplify quick. The induced potential difference is written out using Faraday’s law:
+\begin{align*}
+u_{\rm ind} &= N B A \cdot \sin \varphi \cdot {{{\rm d} \varphi}\over{{\rm d}t}}
+\end{align*}
+</collapse>
+<button size="xs" type="link" collapse="Solution_4_3_4_1_Solution">{{icon>eye}} Solution</button><collapse id="Solution_4_3_4_1_Solution" collapsed="true">
+We are given that $N=200$, $B=0.80~\rm T$ , $\varphi = 90°$ , $\Delta\varphi=90°=\pi/2$ , and $\Delta t=5.0~\rm ms$ .
+The area of the loop is
+\begin{align*}
+A = \pi r^2 = 3.14 \cdot (0.0500~\rm m)^2 = 7.85 \cdot 10^{-3} ~\rm m^2
+\end{align*}
+</collapse> <button size="xs" type="link" collapse="Solution_4_3_4_1_Result">{{icon>eye}} Result</button><collapse id="Solution_4_3_4_1_Result" collapsed="true">
+Entering this value gives
+\begin{align*}
+U_{\rm ind} &= 200 \cdot 0.80 ~\rm T \cdot (7.85 \cdot 10^{-3} ~\rm m^2) \cdot \sin 90° \cdot {{\pi /2}\over{5.0 \cdot 10^{-3} ~\rm s}} = 395 ~\rm V
+\end{align*}
+</collapse> </WRAP></WRAP></panel>
+<panel type="info" title="Exercise 4.1.6 Coil in magnetic Field I"> <WRAP group><WRAP column 2%>{{fa>pencil?32}}</WRAP><WRAP column 92%>
+A single winding is located in a homogenous magnetic field ($B = 0.5 ~\rm T$) between the pole pieces.
+The winding has a length of $150 ~\rm mm$ and a distance between the conductors of $50 ~\rm mm$ (see <imgref ImgNrEx03>).
+  * Determine the function $u_{\rm ind}(t)$, when the coil is rotating with $3000 ~\rm min^{-1}$.
+  * Given a current of $20 ~\rm A$ through the winding: What is the torque $M(\varphi)$ depending on the angle between the surface vector of the winding and the magnetic field?
+<WRAP> <imgcaption ImgNrEx03| Winding between Pole Pieces> </imgcaption> <WRAP> {{drawio>WindingPolePieces.svg}} \\ </WRAP></WRAP>
+<button size="xs" type="link" collapse="Solution_4_1_6_1_Solution">{{icon>eye}} Solution</button><collapse id="Solution_4_1_6_1_Solution" collapsed="true">
+\begin{align*}
+u_{\rm ind} &= -   {{{\rm d}\Phi}\over{{\rm d}t}} \\
+            &= -         {{\rm d}\over{{\rm d}t}} B \cdot A \\
+            &= - B \cdot {{\rm d}\over{{\rm d}t}} A\\
+            &= - B \cdot {{\rm d}\over{{\rm d}t}} \left(l \cdot d \cdot \cos(\omega t) \right)\\
+            &= + B \cdot l \cdot d \cdot \omega \cdot \sin(\omega t)\\
+\end{align*}
+</collapse> </WRAP></WRAP></panel>
+<panel type="info" title="Exercise 4.1.7 Coil in magnetic Field II"> <WRAP group><WRAP column 2%>{{fa>pencil?32}}</WRAP><WRAP column 92%>
+A rectangular coil is given by the sizes $a=10 ~\rm cm$, $b=4 ~\rm cm$, and the number of windings $N=200$.
+This coil moves with a constant speed of $v=2 ~\rm m/s$ perpendicular to a homogeneous magnetic field ($B=1.3 ~\rm T$ on a length of $l=5 ~\rm cm$).
+The area of the coil is tilted with regard to the field in $\alpha=60°$ and enters the field from the left side (see <imgref ImgNrEx04>).
+  * Determine the function $u_{\rm ind}(t)$ on the coil along the given path. Sketch of the $u_{\rm ind}(t)$ diagram.
+  * What is the maximum induced voltage $u_{\rm ind,Max}$?
+<WRAP> <imgcaption ImgNrEx04| Winding between Pole Pieces> </imgcaption> <WRAP> {{drawio>WindingPolePieces2.svg}} \\ </WRAP></WRAP>
+<button size="xs" type="link" collapse="Solution_4_1_7_1_Solution">{{icon>eye}} Solution</button><collapse id="Solution_4_1_7_1_Solution" collapsed="true">
+Let assume, that $l$ is in the $x$-axis, $\vec{B}$ in the $y$-axis and $a$.
+\\ \\
+**Step 1**: Calculate the effective area, perpendicular to the $\vec{B}$-field (independent from whether the area is in the $\vec{B}$-field or not).
+For this $b$ has to be projected onto the plane perpendicular to the $\vec{B}$-field: $b_{\rm eff}= b \cdot \cos \alpha$
+\begin{align*}
+A_{\rm eff} &= a \cdot b \cdot \cos \alpha
+\end{align*}
+**Step 2**: Focus on entering and exiting the $\vec{B}$-field. \\
+Induction only occurs for ${{\rm d}\over{{\rm d}t}}(A\cdot B)\neq 0$, so here: when the area $A_{\rm eff}$ enters and leave the constant $\vec{B}$-field.
+When entering the $\vec{B}$-field the area $A$ with $0<A<A_{eff}$ is in the field.
+The area moves with $v$. Therefore, after $\Delta t = b_{\rm eff} \cdot v$ the full $\vec{B}$-field is provided onto the area $A_{\rm eff}$:
+\begin{align*}
+u_{\rm ind} &= -        {{{\rm d}\Psi}\over{{\rm d}t}} \\
+            &= -N \cdot       {{\rm d}\over{{\rm d}t}} B \cdot A \\
+            &= -N \cdot           {{1}\over{\Delta t}} B \cdot A_{\rm eff} \\
+            &= -N \cdot {{1}\over{b \cdot \cos \alpha \cdot v}} B \cdot a \cdot b \cdot \cos \alpha \\
+            &= -N \cdot B \cdot {{a}\over{v}}\\
+\end{align*}
+The following diagram shows ...
+  * ... how one can derive the effective width $b_{\rm eff}$, which is projected onto the plane perpendicular to the $\vec{B}$-field: $b_{\rm eff}= b \cdot \cos \alpha$
+  * ... what happens on the effective area $A_{\rm eff}$: there is a change of the field lines in the area only for entering and leaving the $\vec{B}$-field.
+  * ... how the $u_{\rm ind}(t)$ looks as a graph: the part of $A_{\rm eff}$, where the $\vec{B}$-field passes through increase linearly due to the constant speed $v$
+Be aware, that the task did not provide a clue for the direction of windings and therefore it provides no clue for the polarization of the induced voltage. \\
+So, the course of the voltage when entering or exiting is not uniquely given.
+<WRAP> <imgcaption ImgNrEx04s| Solution> </imgcaption> <WRAP>{{drawio>WindingPolePieces2solution.svg}}  \\ </WRAP></WRAP>
+</collapse> </WRAP></WRAP></panel>
 ===== Embedded resources =====